/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) language structure (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: language structure
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignostxt400 - : lexicogrammatical representation were actually connected to its own redundant representation in the semantic system, there would be no reason to postulate a separate semantic stratum in the first place. The very idea of realization (a cornerstone of the two approaches discussed in this paper) seeks to reflect two aspects of language structure: (i ) the fact that one and the same constellation of semantic features may be expressed, at least partially, through different lexicogrammatical units; and (ii) the fact the different constellations of semantic features may be expressed by the same lexicogrammatical unit.
Evaluando al candidato language structure:
1) semantic: 4 (*)
2) lexicogrammatical: 3
language structure
Lengua:
Frec: 88
Docs: 67
Nombre propio: / 88 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 1
Puntaje: 1.535 = (1 + (1+3) / (1+6.4757334309664)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| language structure |
: 17. Stokoe, William. 1960. Sign language structure. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press. : 40. Priestly, T. (1994). Effects of educational and social mobility on language maintenance, language attitudes and language structure: The case of Sele in Carinthia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 15, 199-217. : 41. van Dijk, T. (1997). Cognitive context models and discourse. En M. Stamenow (Ed.). Language Structure, Discourse and the Access to Consciousness (pp. 189-226). Amsterdam: Benjamins. : 9. Biber, D., Conrad, S. y Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. : Biber, D. (2003). Variation among university spoken and written registers: A new multi-dimensional analysis. En Leistyna, P. & Meyer, Ch. (Eds.), Corpus analysis. Language structure and language use (pp. 47-70). Amsterdam: Rodopi. : Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Repen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics. Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. : Bybee, J. (1998). Cognitive Processes in Grammaticalization. En M. Tomasello (ed.) The New Psychology of Language. Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, vol. II (pp. 145-167). Londres: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. : Bybee, J. L. & Hopper, P. (2001). Frequency and the emergence of language structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. : Chafe, W. (1998). Language and the Flow of Thought. En Michael Tomasello (Ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure (pp. 93-111). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum . : Goldberg, A. E. (1998). Patterns of experience in patterns of language. The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, 1, 203-219. : Halliday, M-A. K. (2002). Language Structure and Language Function. En J. Webster (Ed.), On Grammar (pp. 173-195). Londres: Continuum. : Harris, Z. (1959). The Transformational Model of Language Structure. Anthropological Linguistics, 1(1), 27-29. : Hengeveld, K. & Mackenzie, J. (2008). Functional discourse grammar. A typologically-based theory of language structure. Londres & Nueva York: OUP. : Hengeveld, Kees e John Lachlan Mackenzie. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: a typologically based theory of language structure. Oxford, Oxford University Press. : NIDA, E. (1975). Language Structure and Translation. Stanford: Stanford University Press. : Panther, K.-U. & Thornburg, L. (2012). Antonymy in language structure and use. En M. Brdar, M. Ž. Fuchs & I. Raffaelli (Coord.), Cognitive Linguistics Between Universality and Variation. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars; forthcoming. : Payne, T. (2006). Exploring Language structure: a student’s guide. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, London: Cambridge University Press. : Silverstein, M. (1979). Language Structure and Linguistic Ideology. En P. R. Clyne, W. F. Hanks & C. L. Hofbauer (eds.), The Elements: A Parasessionon Linguistic Units and Levels (pp. 193-247). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. : Steinbach, M., y Pfau, R. (2007). Grammaticalization of auxiliaries in sign languages. En P. Perniss, R. Pfau y M. Steinbach (Eds.), Visible variation: Comparative studies on sign language structure. Mouton de Gruyter. : Stokoe, W. (1993). Sign language structure. An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. Linstok Press. (Trabajo original publicado en 1960). : Stokoe, W. C. (1978). Sign language structure. Silver Spring: Linstok Press. : Stokoe, W. C., Jr. (1960). Sign Language Structure: An Outline of the Visual Communication System of the American Deaf. Studies in Linguistics occasional papers, no. 8, Buffalo: Department of Anthropology and Linguistics, University of Buffalo. : Sugayama, K., Hudson, R., & Shinkokai, N. G. (2006). Word Grammar: New Perspectives on a Theory of Language Structure. London; New York: Continuum. : Tomasello, M. (1998). Introduction: A cognitive-functional perspective on language structure. En M. Tomasello (Ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure (pp. vii-xxiii). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. : Van Dijk, T. (1997). Cognitive Context Models and Discourse. In M. Stamenow (Ed.), Language Structure, Discourse and the Access to Consciousness (pp. 189-222). Amsterdam, Benjamins. : [129]Hengeveld, Kees e John Lachlen Mackenzie. [130]2008. Functional Discourse Grammar. A typologically-based theory of language structure, Oxford, Oxford University Press. : [93]Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan y Randi Reppen. 1998. Corpus linguistics. Investigating language structure and use, Cambridge, University Press. |